top of page
Logo Version 4.1 (white).png

How Workplace Mediation Can Help When a Grievance Is Really About a Broken Working Relationship

Writer: Kushalta Saini
Kushalta Saini
Jul 6
6 min read
Workplace meeting pre-grievance. KS Consultancy Mediation Services

Most workplace grievances do not begin with a single dramatic event.


Instead, they often develop over weeks or months through a series of misunderstandings, communication difficulties, perceived unfairness, personality differences or unresolved tensions. Eventually, something happens that becomes the trigger for a formal complaint, but the real issue has often been developing long before that point.


This is one of the reasons why formal grievance procedures, while essential in many circumstances, do not always solve the underlying problem. They can establish facts, clarify policies and determine whether organisational procedures have been followed. What they cannot always do is rebuild trust between two people who still need to work together every day.


This is where workplace mediation can play an important role.


For HR professionals, managers and business leaders, understanding the difference between resolving a grievance and repairing a working relationship can make a significant difference to long-term workplace wellbeing, productivity and employee retention.

 

Looking Beyond the Grievance

When someone raises a grievance, the document itself often focuses on specific incidents.

Perhaps an employee feels excluded from meetings. Perhaps they believe they have been spoken to disrespectfully. Maybe they feel their manager has treated them unfairly, or communication between colleagues has completely broken down.


These issues are important and deserve to be considered properly.


However, beneath the written complaint there may be much deeper concerns, including:

  • Loss of trust.

  • Feeling unheard or undervalued.

  • Communication that has steadily deteriorated.

  • Assumptions replacing conversations.

  • Long-standing misunderstandings.

  • Different expectations about roles or responsibilities.

  • Personality clashes that have gradually intensified.


The grievance is often the visible symptom. The relationship is where the underlying difficulty may lie.

 

The Hidden Cost of Damaged Working Relationships

When relationships at work become strained, the effects are rarely limited to the individuals directly involved.


Managers spend increasing amounts of time managing conflict rather than leading their teams. Productivity can decline as communication becomes cautious or stops altogether. Colleagues may begin taking sides, creating wider tensions across the department. Sickness absence, stress and staff turnover can also increase.


Sometimes both individuals continue behaving professionally on the surface while privately avoiding each other wherever possible.


From the outside, the situation may appear manageable.


In reality, collaboration has broken down.


These situations rarely improve on their own. More commonly, they become increasingly difficult to resolve as positions become entrenched.

 

Why Formal Grievances Can Sometimes Make Relationships Harder to Repair

Formal grievance procedures exist for good reason. Employers have legal responsibilities, and employees must have a safe and structured way to raise concerns.


Some situations require a formal investigation immediately, particularly where there are allegations involving discrimination, harassment, bullying, safeguarding concerns or other serious misconduct.


However, many workplace disputes sit in a different category.


Where there has been no serious misconduct, moving directly into a formal process can unintentionally reinforce conflict.


Once written statements have been submitted and evidence gathered, individuals often begin focusing on proving their own position rather than understanding each other's perspective.


The conversation shifts from:

"How do we resolve this?" to "Who is right?"


Even where the investigation is conducted fairly and reaches an appropriate outcome, the individuals involved may still find it difficult to rebuild a constructive working relationship afterwards.


A grievance can determine what happened.


It cannot always restore trust.

 

When Workplace Mediation May Be Appropriate

Mediation is not designed to replace organisational policies or formal procedures.

Instead, it provides a confidential, structured conversation led by an independent, impartial mediator where both people have an opportunity to explain how the situation has affected them and explore whether a way forward can be found.


Depending on the circumstances, mediation may take place:

  • preferably before a formal grievance is submitted;

  • alongside other organisational processes where appropriate;

  • after a grievance has concluded, when the relationship still needs repairing; or

  • following workplace changes where communication has broken down.


Every organisation is different, and each situation should be considered individually.


The key question is often not whether someone has raised concerns. It is whether the people involved still need to work together moving forward.


If the answer is yes, rebuilding communication may be just as important as resolving the complaint itself.


What Mediation Can Achieve

Many people assume mediation is simply about encouraging individuals to apologise.

In reality, effective workplace mediation goes much further.


It creates an opportunity for people to understand how the conflict developed, identify misunderstandings, clarify expectations and begin rebuilding professional communication.


Through mediation, participants may:

  • better understand each other's perspective;

  • address misunderstandings that have been driving the conflict;

  • agree practical ways of communicating more effectively;

  • establish clear expectations for future working relationships;

  • reduce ongoing tension within the wider team; and

  • regain confidence in working together professionally.


Importantly, mediation is voluntary.


Nobody is forced to agree with the other person's viewpoint or accept responsibility for issues they genuinely dispute. Instead, the process focuses on helping participants have constructive conversations that may not have been possible without independent facilitation.

 

What Mediation Cannot Do

It is equally important to understand the limits of mediation. Mediation is not suitable for every workplace issue.

  • It is not an investigation.

  • It does not determine who is right or wrong.

  • It does not replace disciplinary procedures.

  • It does not make legal findings.

  • It does not compel anyone to reach an agreement.


Where allegations involve serious misconduct, safeguarding concerns, discrimination, criminal behaviour or significant breaches of organisational policy, formal procedures are likely to remain the appropriate first step.


Good HR practice involves recognising which process best fits the circumstances.


Supporting People Who Need to Continue Working Together

One of the most distinctive features of workplace conflict is that the individuals involved often have no choice but to continue working together. Unlike many personal disputes, resignation or redeployment is not always realistic or desirable.

  • Teams still need to deliver projects.

  • Managers still need to supervise staff.

  • Colleagues still need to collaborate.


This makes repairing working relationships particularly valuable.


Successful mediation does not necessarily mean people become close friends. Instead, it helps create professional, respectful working relationships where communication becomes possible again and future disagreements can be handled more constructively.


For organisations, this often delivers benefits that extend well beyond the individuals involved. Improved communication can strengthen team morale, reduce management time spent on conflict and create healthier workplace cultures over the longer term.

 

Early Conversations Often Make the Greatest Difference

One of the most common patterns seen in workplace disputes is delay.

  • People hope the situation will improve by itself.

  • Managers encourage individuals to "work it out."

  • Communication becomes increasingly limited.

  • Frustration grows.


Eventually, someone submits a formal grievance because they feel they have exhausted every other option.


By that stage, positions may already have hardened.


This is why early intervention is so valuable.


That does not mean avoiding difficult conversations or discouraging legitimate grievances.

It means recognising relationship difficulties before they become formal disputes and considering whether facilitated conversations could help prevent further deterioration.


Even where mediation is not appropriate, encouraging respectful dialogue at an earlier stage often gives organisations more options than waiting until conflict has become deeply entrenched.

 

Choosing the Right Approach

Every workplace conflict is different.


There is no single process that fits every situation.


Sometimes an informal conversation is enough.


Sometimes mediation provides the opportunity to rebuild communication before relationships become irreparable.


Sometimes a formal grievance is entirely appropriate.


The important consideration is understanding what the organisation is trying to achieve.

If the objective is simply to investigate allegations, a grievance process may be the correct route.


If the objective is also to restore professional working relationships and enable people to work together more effectively in the future, mediation may provide an additional opportunity that formal procedures alone cannot always offer.


By considering both the procedural issues and the human relationships involved, organisations place themselves in a stronger position to resolve conflict in a way that supports both individuals and the wider workplace.


When handled thoughtfully, workplace conflict does not have to define future working relationships. With the right support, constructive conversations can often help people move beyond the grievance itself and focus on building a healthier way of working together.


Kushalta Saini is an expert Workplace Mediator based in Hammersmith, London and provides conflict and dispute resolution support services to clients across London and the South East. If you need support with your situation, please contact Kushalta for an informal and confidential discussion.

Comments


bottom of page